Skip to main content
 

ENGL45930: Neurodiversity and the Humanities (Online)

It is possible that changes to modules or programmes might need to be made during the academic year, in response to the impact of Covid-19 and/or any further changes in public health advice.

Type Open
Level 4
Credits 30
Availability Available in 2024/2025
Module Cap 20
Location Durham
Department English Studies

Prerequisites

  • None

Corequisites

  • None

Excluded Combinations of Modules

  • None

Aims

  • To introduce students to the emergent field of Neurodiversity Studies and to provide advanced training within this exciting and enabling field of academic enquiry.
  • To develop in students a strong understanding of how an appreciation of neurological variation can enable us to discover new and previously overlooked perspectives in relation to a variety of texts and mixed-media sources.
  • To interrogate the neurotypical biases within standard models of literary and cultural criticism and wider medical humanities scholarship.
  • To equip students with the tools to devise and deliver their own mode of assessment in their preferred format.

Content

  • In this module, students will engage with a diverse range of literary, historical, and cultural texts that decentre the neurotypical experience in favour of an alternative that diverges from the norm within a given socio-political context.
  • The module starts by interrogating the diagnostic basis of several conditions labelled as neurodivergent, bringing cognitive and developmental psychology into conversation with writings from neurodivergent advocates and activists. Key tenets of the Neurodiversity movement will be introduced, acknowledging that it brings together a variety of perspectives and practices united in their challenge to mainstream biomedical models of neurological divergence and disability.
  • The module then moves on a weekly basis through various critical reconfigurations of neurodivergence and engagements with different media. These include: neurodivergent literary theory and approaches to textual analysis, historical case studies, neurodiversity and the literary canon, creative practice, life-writing and self-advocacy, YA and writing for representation, and contemporary poetics. The module makes use of a variety of media including zines, comics, dance, theatre, stand-up comedy, and literary texts to interrogate the accessibility of differing forms of presentation.

Learning Outcomes

Subject-specific Knowledge:

  • On completion of this module, students will be able to:
  • Understand the complexities of the neurodiversity movement and use these to rethink conceptual frameworks and approaches to cultural criticism.
  • Recognise and analyse the areas of tension and the intersection between Neurodiversity Studies and the associated disciplines of Disability Studies, Mad Studies, and the wider Medical and Health Humanities.
  • Situate debates about neurodiversity and access within broader social, political, economic, and ideological contexts.
  • Articulate the advantages and limitations of particular modes of scholarship with respect to diverse learning needs

Subject-specific Skills:

  • Articulate an advanced knowledge and understanding of a range of conceptual and scholarly approaches to neurodiversity across a variety of media.
  • Interrogate and challenge the centrality of the neurotypical both in cultural products and in scholarship.
  • Analyse a diverse range of media to form a nuanced and informed reading of specific texts covered in depth on the module
  • Devise an appropriate approach to explore an aspect of neurodiversity in culture and demonstrate learning
  • Apply reflective and self-evaluative practices to critique their own approaches to the core concepts of the module.

Key Skills:

  • An advanced ability to engage with cutting-edge research and to evaluate current ideas critically and with sensitivity and nuance.
  • An advanced ability to select and synthesise complex material in different media and from a wide range of sources in order to produce effective scholarly responses to key questions
  • Sophisticated skills in critical reasoning with an advanced ability to handle information and argue critically and creatively.
  • Extended skills in the interpretation of information through close reading and research.
  • The capacity to consider accessibility at the forefront of academic endeavour.
  • The ability to engage in disciplined reflection upon their own processes through independent learning and feedback.
  • The ability to plan work effectively with appropriate time-management skills.

Modes of Teaching, Learning and Assessment and how these contribute to the learning outcomes of the module

  • This module will be delivered primarily by the Department of English Studies, but it will draw upon the interdisciplinary expertise of affiliates of the Institute for Medical Humanities and additional external collaborators with specific insights, including from their lived experience.
  • As the module is focused on neurodiversity, the mediums of assessment can be adapted to enable neurodiverse students to flourish according to their own strengths. In practice, this means that written assessments may be exchanged for transcriptions of oral recordings (or similar) to meet access requirements.
  • The content of the module will be delivered online through asynchronous methods, such as pre-recorded lectures, discussion forums, and short written (or recorded) tasks. There will be two 30-minute synchronous supervisions over the module with the course convener to discuss assessment plans and guidance on course content and further reading. This is to give the participants 1:1 contact time with a tutor to support them through the online delivery.
  • As this module is fully asynchronous, no activities will be centrally timetabled and students are expected to work through the course material according to their own schedules. The 1:1 synchronous supervisions will be organised directly between the tutor and student as schedules permit.
  • There are three summative assessments: a combined plan for the student-devised assessment (SDA) and annotated bibliography (30%), a student-devised assessment in a format of the students choosing, to include a bibliography and critical commentary (50%); submission of weekly learning logs, of which 3 will be formally assessed (20%).
  • Students will submit a 500-750 word plan and annotated bibliography of 5-7 texts as preparation for their SDA. These will describe: their research idea, the central issues that they will engage with, their planned method of delivery, and relevant scholarship. The Student Devised Assessment presents an opportunity for students to draw on their various strengths, backgrounds, and interests, to produce a piece of work that engages with an aspect of neurodiversity and its intersections with the humanities. Guidance will be given throughout the term (in supervisions and over discussion forums) as to what formats might be suitable and appropriate in terms of scale/time investment/academic rigour. Examples might be: a podcast, a video series, a short film, a zine, a portfolio of art or creative writing. Along with their final SDA project piece, students will submit a bibliography and a 1000-1500 word critical commentary on their work.
  • Personal learning logs of 300 words completed weekly will give a sense of structure to remote learning and will help students to synthesise and reflect upon the weeks materials. Three of these will be formally assessed.

Teaching Methods and Learning Hours

ActivityNumberFrequencyDurationTotalMonitored
Asynchronous lectures (consisting of multiple short videos from various collaborators each week)9Weekly90 minutes13.5 
Engagement with weekly discussion forum tasks9Weekly30 minutes4.5Yes
1:1 synchronous supervision2Twice30 minutes1Yes
Independent preparation and reading281 
Total300 

Summative Assessment

Component: SDA Plan and Annotated BibliographyComponent Weighting: 30%
ElementLength / DurationElement WeightingResit Opportunity
SDA Plan500-750 words50
Annotated Bibliography1250 words (5-7 entries)50
Component: Student Directed AssessmentComponent Weighting: 50%
ElementLength / DurationElement WeightingResit Opportunity
SDA ProjectTo be agreed with Convenor70
BibliographyAs appropriate5
Critical Commentary1000 words25
Component: Personal Learning LogsComponent Weighting: 20%
ElementLength / DurationElement WeightingResit Opportunity
Learning LogsStudents will be expected to write 300 words per week, and indicate 3 for assessment. 100

Formative Assessment

More information

If you have a question about Durham's modular degree programmes, please visit our Help page. If you have a question about modular programmes that is not covered by the Help page, or a query about the on-line Postgraduate Module Handbook, please contact us.

Prospective Students: If you have a query about a specific module or degree programme, please Ask Us.

Current Students: Please contact your department.