Skip to main content
 

PHIL42530: Biomedical Ethics (online)

It is possible that changes to modules or programmes might need to be made during the academic year, in response to the impact of Covid-19 and/or any further changes in public health advice.

Type Open
Level 4
Credits 30
Availability Available in 2024/2025
Module Cap None.
Location Durham
Department Philosophy

Prerequisites

  • None

Corequisites

  • None

Excluded Combinations of Modules

  • None

Aims

  • This module equips students with a practically applicable, theoretically rigorous understanding of major topics in biomedical ethics. Thinking through permissibility and requirement, duties and rights, care and community membership, and medical access and inequality in the context of human and animal life are deep and longstanding concerns of the health professions. With the advent of new technologies, the erosion of the distinction between human and machine capabilities, and fast-evolving ethical awareness of rights and responsibilities in both human and animal realms, these issues are becoming even more crucial in our time. Synthesizing theoretical analysis and contemporary real-world case studies, this module equips students with the knowledge and critical analytic skills to tackle, in rigorous and practical ways, the most contentious biomedical ethical issues at the intersection of medicine, public health, law, history, and philosophy, with an eye on challenges that the future may hold.

Content

  • Taking a topic-led approach, the module employs work and methods from philosophy, history, clinical bioethics, and law. The topics covered in the course may develop in response to events in both the world and the literature. As well as more familiar topics such as principlist accounts of bioethics and legal-ethical issues, the treatment of animals, end and beginning of life, the course will include issues coming to prominence more recently such as race, non-western bioethical and medical traditions, issues relating to artificial intelligence in medicine, and environmental bioethics. (These lists are illustrative only.)

Learning Outcomes

Subject-specific Knowledge:

  • Understanding of different theoretical perspectives on ethical action in a variety of settings
  • Knowledge of specific episodes, historical and/or contemporary, from different parts of the world, that illustrate this theoretical knowledge
  • Knowledge of key historical and contemporary contexts and questions around which ethical concepts were formed
  • Awareness of how the existence of multiple epistemologies and power dynamics affect the development of bioethics and shape its major questions
  • Awareness of biomedical ethical issues that may arise with future developments and disruptions

Subject-specific Skills:

  • Comprehension of novel ideas and conceptual frameworks relating to multiple bioethical traditions in multiple cultures
  • Charitable yet critical engagement with medical, legal and bioethical literature and thought
  • Ability to critically engage historical and contemporary sources and ground questions in their biomedical context
  • Ability to engage in public discussion on relevant topics and apply the knowledge learned in this context

Key Skills:

  • Express ideas clearly and succinctly in writing and discussion
  • Comprehend complex ideas, propositions and theories
  • Defend opinions by reasoned argument
  • Seek out and identify appropriate sources of evidence and information
  • Tackle problems in a clear-sighted and logical fashion
  • Communicate complex ideas clearly and persuasively to a wider audience

Modes of Teaching, Learning and Assessment and how these contribute to the learning outcomes of the module

  • Recorded lectures (held online) broken into short chunks, discussion forum activities, recorded presentations, and 1:1 consultations will provide the opportunity for students to present their own work in progress, to test their understanding of the course material, and defend and debate different opinions on theories and questions presented in that material.
  • Delivery will be asynchronous to accommodate students with different time commitments and in different time zones
  • As this module is fully asynchronous, no activities will be centrally timetabled and students are expected to work through the course material according to their own schedules. The 1:1 sessions should be organised directly between the tutor and student as schedules permit.
  • Guided reading provides a structure within which students exercise and extend their abilities to make use of available learning resources.
  • The summative essays test knowledge and understanding of the course material, and the ability to identify and explain philosophical questions raised by the natural and medical sciences, and, using relevant research material, to present relevant philosophical theories and arguments that claim to answer those questions, and to make reasoned judgements on the merits and demerits of such theories.
  • The public facing component develops skills for communicating complex ideas into contexts of public discourse. Examples of the project could include a newspaper opinion piece and/or blog. The word limit for the public facing project is deliberately tight, to represent the context of writing for a public audience, but length may be subject to student-instructor agreed modification based on project. Non-written projects format and assessment to be agreed with module leader.

Teaching Methods and Learning Hours

ActivityNumberFrequencyDurationTotalMonitored
Asynchronous lectures consisting of multiple short videos each week 9Weekly1 hour9 
Engagement with weekly discussion forum tasks 7 Weekly1 hour7Yes
Watching recorded student presentations 2Twice2 hours4 
1:1 meetings with module convenor 2Twice30 minutes1Yes
Preparation and Reading 279 
Total 300 

Summative Assessment

Component: Coursework Component Weighting: 70%
ElementLength / DurationElement WeightingResit Opportunity
Essay 12000 words50One resit capped at pass mark
Essay 22000 words50One resit capped at pass mark
Component: Component Weighting: 30%
ElementLength / DurationElement WeightingResit Opportunity
Public Facing Project 1000 words. Non-written projects may also be acceptable subject to module leader agreement. 100One modified deadline, capped at the pass mark

Formative Assessment

Students record short presentations on the topic of each summative essay and receive peer and instructor feedback.

More information

If you have a question about Durham's modular degree programmes, please visit our Help page. If you have a question about modular programmes that is not covered by the Help page, or a query about the on-line Postgraduate Module Handbook, please contact us.

Prospective Students: If you have a query about a specific module or degree programme, please Ask Us.

Current Students: Please contact your department.