Skip to main content
 

CLAS3731: Technologies of Knowledge in Antiquity

Please ensure you check the module availability box for each module outline, as not all modules will run in each academic year. Each module description relates to the year indicated in the module availability box, and this may change from year to year, due to, for example: changing staff expertise, disciplinary developments, the requirements of external bodies and partners, and student feedback. Current modules are subject to change in light of the ongoing disruption caused by Covid-19.

Type Open
Level 3
Credits 20
Availability Not available in 2024/2025
Module Cap None.
Location Durham
Department Classics and Ancient History

Prerequisites

  • CLAS1301 or CLAS1601 or a Philosophy module at Level 2

Corequisites

  • None

Excluded Combinations of Modules

  • None

Aims

  • To introduce students to a variety of modes of thinking about knowledge and its technologies in ancient Greek and Roman philosophy, history, and science
  • To examine the continuity and change in ancient scientific epistemology, from oral transmission of knowledge to archiving and encyclopaedic arrangements
  • To understand how philosophy and science are implicated in their developments in the ancient world
  • To explore and analyse a range of relevant sources and the benefits and difficulties of using them together
  • To consider 20th and 21st scholarly approaches to these issues, and to evaluate them in relation to the ancient evidence

Content

  • Scholars of Classics and Ancient History now regularly recognise that approaches to memory and knowledge are contingent, and culturally specific, in the ancient world. What is often less well known is how the ancient Greeks and Romans developed their own sophisticated theories of knowledge and memory, with a special emphasis on identifying the collection and arrangement of knowledge by appeal to a particular "techne/ars" ("art" or "skill"). Hence, one can speak of "technologies of knowledge", which range from oral transmission of poetry in Archaic Greece to the project of archiving previous scientific knowledge in the Roman Empire. Moreover, it is the case that ancient intellectuals, including philosophers, historians, and writers of so-called technical" treatises, developed their own theories about this process of knowledge organization and production, evaluating it according to the scientific and ethical contributions it makes to society and human life. This module would seek to elucidate both the scholarly approaches to memory and knowledge in antiquity, which are often borne out of anthropological models rooted in human psychology, and the ancients' own approaches to memory and knowledge, which are more invested in facilitating a universal knowledge of the world that is, concurrently, ethical in outlook. Hence, the module would seek to investigate and explain the differences between the modern and the ancient ways of understanding how ancient knowledge was preserved and organized.

Learning Outcomes

Subject-specific Knowledge:

  • A basic knowledge of the major developments in ancient philosophical, scientific, and historical epistemology, across several areas (mathematics, physics, cosmology, musicology, biology, mechanics, anthropology, history)
  • An awareness of the extensive evidence "philosophical, historical, literary, material" available for studying ancient knowledge and theories of its organization
  • An understanding of key topics of study for this period, including "science", "knowledge", "technology", "theory", "practice", "memory", and "archive"
  • A critical knowledge of approaches and debates in both ancient and current scholarship on these subjects.

Subject-specific Skills:

  • The ability to analyse and draw conclusions from a broad range of primary sources from the ancient world, including Greek and Latin writings (in translation) from subjects as apparently disparate as philosophy, history, science, and technology
  • The capacity to evaluate the inherent values and problems with particular types of ancient sources and to use them judiciously to construct a careful and nuanced picture of the development of scientific epistemology in antiquity
  • The ability to engage critically with modern literature on the technologies of knowledge and their applications to ancient knowledge organization

Key Skills:

  • The ability to assess and compare a range of different arguments and approaches.
  • The ability to use diverse types of evidence to build up a cumulative picture.
  • The capacity to produce tight, well-evidenced and clearly expressed arguments in both oral and in written form.
  • The capacity to compare and contrast ancient and modern arguments concerning the issue.

Modes of Teaching, Learning and Assessment and how these contribute to the learning outcomes of the module

  • Lectures introduce students to the chronology and typology of the various sciences and the ways in which knowledge is organized for them
  • Seminars will treat topics designed to complement the lecture series, allowing students to explore collectively their own ideas about the courses' major themes. Each seminar will treat a contained case study through prepared portfolios of ancient evidence and select pieces of secondary scholarship (both classic pieces and cutting-edge scholarship).
  • Tutorials provide the opportunity to explore in more depth topics of students' choice, and to receive detailed feedback on written and oral work.
  • Oral Presentations allow students to present a specific topic to their peers, and to reflect upon how the mode of exposition conditions the reception and construction of knowledge

Teaching Methods and Learning Hours

ActivityNumberFrequencyDurationTotalMonitored
Lectures20Weekly1 hour20Yes
Tutorials21 per term in Epiphany and Easter terms1 hour2Yes
Seminars53 in Michaelmas term and 2 in Epiphany term 1 hour5Yes
Preparation and reading173 
200 

Summative Assessment

Component: EssayComponent Weighting: 40%
ElementLength / DurationElement WeightingResit Opportunity
Essay2500 words100Yes
Component: EssayComponent Weighting: 40%
ElementLength / DurationElement WeightingResit Opportunity
Essay2500 words100Yes
Component: Oral PresentationComponent Weighting: 20%
ElementLength / DurationElement WeightingResit Opportunity
Oral Presentation15 minutes100Yes

Formative Assessment

One formative exercise

More information

If you have a question about Durham's modular degree programmes, please visit our FAQ webpages, Help page or our glossary of terms. If you have a question about modular programmes that is not covered by the FAQ, or a query about the on-line Undergraduate Module Handbook, please contact us.

Prospective Students: If you have a query about a specific module or degree programme, please Ask Us.

Current Students: Please contact your department.